Traffic Density and Speed Limits
The lower and slower, respectively, the better.
6 comments
-
Anonymous
commented
http://www.tffanycheapmall.com/tiffany-bangles-c-4.html
http://www.tffanycheapmall.com/tiffany-bangles-c-4.html
http://www.tffanycheapmall.com
http://www.tffanycheapmall.com/tiffany-bangles-c-4.html
http://www.tffanycheapmall.com/tiffany-bracelet-c-5.html
http://www.tffanycheapmall.com/tiffany-bracelet-c-5.html
http://www.tffanycheapmall.com/tiffany-bracelet-c-5.html -
Mike Dour
commented
You can have plenty of bike lanes, but if traffic speeds are high then the people won't ride! Especially true in suburban environments where high speed and high volume arterial roads are often the only through roads to get someone from point A to point B.
-
strfsh
commented
Ditto Carrie on density. Actual speed is more important than posted speed but considerably harder to find out so speed posted speeds will probably have to do.
-
Carrie
commented
Sometimes in low density, "slow" areas cars aren't used to seeing bikes and run through stop signs, making it more dangerous than a busy lane with a big bike lane where everyone is more alert...
-
Griebs
commented
I feel that, but the more exhaust there is to breathe and the more the pedal is desired to be put to metal the less appetizing it is to exist in traffic. Then again there is imagining your super human ability to transform minds through harnessing pure jealousy.
-
Lyle
commented
I find that both very low and very high traffic density are equally good for cycling. During rush hour traffic jams, the average speed of traffic is lower than walking -- eminently bikeable. So this metric would be a little bit tricky to get right, as it varies by time of day.