3 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• josh commented  ·  December 2, 2010 5:14 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Paths that lead no where are not that interesting to most folks. Some weighting needs to be given to whether separated bike paths are useful to get places or are just recreational trails to nowhere.

• mag ellen commented  ·  October 1, 2010 2:24 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Length and path surface is very important. And connection to other long trails.

• cr commented  ·  September 30, 2010 12:33 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Commuter bike lanes are important. But off-street recreational biking opportunities are also important, especially for families. I would suggest two metrics: (1) Distance to nearest recreational bike path entrance (park, etc.) and (2) Total length of recreational bike path within a given radius (say, 5 miles).