What should we include in Bike Score?

Number of bicyclists

Ummm.... what other more direct indicator is there? Algorithms are helpful, but sampling of actual cycling is key.

146 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    I agree to the terms of service
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Scott RinggoldScott Ringgold shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    4 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I like this a lot. Safer biking is correlated to number of cyclists on the road. The more cyclists on the road the better the coexistance between drivers and cyclists will be. For example there are huge shifts in driver behavior between Copenhagen, Portland, Chicago, and Dallas. More specifically different parts of town have different intensities of cyclists. For example even though downtowns often have major streets, almost any street in any downtown is moderately bikeable as opposed to a street in the suburbs.

      • Ville MVille M commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Even better if you get sampling of type of cyclist, 1 kid or women is worth 2 points vs men 1 point each or something like that. This data wont be available in most towns, but where you have it, data availability alone means thats its a bikeable place.

      • johnjohn commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I agree. Maybe look at number of local bike clubs & bike races.

      Feedback and Knowledge Base